Shouldn't u a-GRE-e : A plebiscite for Kashmir : The Indian Perpective
The eden of pre-independence India has turned into a war ravaged state. The cause of fight between two nations has changed the heaven into a battlefield for two nations which are turning towards nuclear weapons for their security. An apocalypse is sure to be seen if the issue of kashmir is not resolved soon enough.
The current discussions (so called high level ones) ongoing between India and its adversary Pakistan( being overlooked indirectly by the Big Brother of all nations) do ponder over the issues related to the sharing of the state of Kashmir. Why does any one not talk about the wishes of Kashmiri people themselves.
The Indian stance on the issue: Pakistan should first stop the militant infiltration and then the peace talk should begin. Secondly the king of erstwhile Kashmir state, Maharaja Hari Singh had himself decided to join India. These two stands are vague and illogical because:
Firstly, according to reports most of the militants are Kashmiri people trained in Pakistani militancy camps. These people take up arms and so they are called terrorists. So, fighting for the independence of one's own country is called "Terrorism" or Miltancy. So by the same logic, Sardar Bhagat Singh and Subash Chandra Bose were terrorists too !!
Secondly,The Indian logic that goes on with the occupation of Kashmir is that Maharaj Hari Singh signed the accord for merging of kasmir with the indian Federal republic( this was done in haste as the combined forces of Pakistan and China had attacked upon Kashmir in 1948 and maharaja hari Singh had no other options!!)
The main reason why Kashmir has become a hotspot is its importance as a strategic military hold which is being avoided in all the peace talks.
So why should India agree for a plebiscite in Kashmir.
Firstly, both India and pakistan have now become nuclear powers and the subcontinent, being in the state of constant tension, may become a nuclear flashpoint.
Secondly, why should Indian Government waste much of its financial and time concentrating on the protection of kashmir. The cause of militancy in Kasmir as well as rest of India is the militancy due the Kashmir dispute. Better concetrate upon welfare issues as well as economic issues( both financially and temporally)
Thirdly, why should India bear the brunt of Al Qaeda and similiar organizations only because of its domination of Kashmir.
Fourthly, every state like kashmir should have right of self- determination rather than miltary domination.
Summing up, a plebscite in Kashmir should bring a lot of peace in the war ravaged subcontinent.
What do you say ? Please comment ..
The current discussions (so called high level ones) ongoing between India and its adversary Pakistan( being overlooked indirectly by the Big Brother of all nations) do ponder over the issues related to the sharing of the state of Kashmir. Why does any one not talk about the wishes of Kashmiri people themselves.
The Indian stance on the issue: Pakistan should first stop the militant infiltration and then the peace talk should begin. Secondly the king of erstwhile Kashmir state, Maharaja Hari Singh had himself decided to join India. These two stands are vague and illogical because:
Firstly, according to reports most of the militants are Kashmiri people trained in Pakistani militancy camps. These people take up arms and so they are called terrorists. So, fighting for the independence of one's own country is called "Terrorism" or Miltancy. So by the same logic, Sardar Bhagat Singh and Subash Chandra Bose were terrorists too !!
Secondly,The Indian logic that goes on with the occupation of Kashmir is that Maharaj Hari Singh signed the accord for merging of kasmir with the indian Federal republic( this was done in haste as the combined forces of Pakistan and China had attacked upon Kashmir in 1948 and maharaja hari Singh had no other options!!)
The main reason why Kashmir has become a hotspot is its importance as a strategic military hold which is being avoided in all the peace talks.
So why should India agree for a plebiscite in Kashmir.
Firstly, both India and pakistan have now become nuclear powers and the subcontinent, being in the state of constant tension, may become a nuclear flashpoint.
Secondly, why should Indian Government waste much of its financial and time concentrating on the protection of kashmir. The cause of militancy in Kasmir as well as rest of India is the militancy due the Kashmir dispute. Better concetrate upon welfare issues as well as economic issues( both financially and temporally)
Thirdly, why should India bear the brunt of Al Qaeda and similiar organizations only because of its domination of Kashmir.
Fourthly, every state like kashmir should have right of self- determination rather than miltary domination.
Summing up, a plebscite in Kashmir should bring a lot of peace in the war ravaged subcontinent.
What do you say ? Please comment ..
posted by Savya at 2:03 AM
2 Comments:
Sorry, these are my Very Own words
A practice for analogy sections for GRE
Look Pakistan was formed as an anti-India or anti-Hindu state so it will act so until and unless it is destroyed fully. Giving up Kashmir will only boost their morale.
But Kashmir has a lot of strategic importance. It is the gate way to India which is well protected by the mighty Himalayas. If it will be with Pak or indipendent then in future it can act as a base for a massive infantry invasion against India. Also its proximity to China, Afganistan, Russia adds to its vitality.
We have to care for our security first and for it we have to keep Kashmir with us.
If u give Kashmir then the resources being spent for liberation of Kashmir will be spent for liberation of North-Eastern territories or Punjab or even fuel the Maoists. So the best way is to act against the prevailing unemployment in Kashmir n to destroy the economy of Pak by hook or crook. A devasted economy can never sustain long proxy-wars.
Post a Comment
<< Home